1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2000 Honda J-VX
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 210 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3.
Because 1996 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW Z3 (275 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1996 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2000 Honda J-VX | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | Z3 | J-VX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 999 cc |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2720 mm |