1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (184 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 168 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW Z3 (275 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1996 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW Z3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW Z3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW Z3 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | Z3 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 45 L |
