1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2003 Dodge Kahuna
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3.
Because 1996 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2003 Dodge Kahuna | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Z3 | Kahuna |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1710 mm |