1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (184 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z3 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 132 L |