1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2004 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2004 Renault Kangoo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2004 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW Z3 (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Kangoo. 1996 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Kangoo has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Kangoo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2004 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | Z3 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |