1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | Z3 | 300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 5653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 529 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |