1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (184 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1081 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW Z3 | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | Z3 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 132 L |
