1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | Z3 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 393 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 78 L |