1996 BMW Z3 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 739 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3. 1996 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2013 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW Z3 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make BMW Cadillac
Model Z3 CTS-V
Year Released 1996 2013
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2926 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 201 HP 548 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 275 Nm 747 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1255 kg 1994 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]