1996 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1949 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1996 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Bristol Blenheim | 1949 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Blenheim | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3210 mm |
