1996 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2001 Cadillac XLR

To start off, 2001 Cadillac XLR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Bristol Blenheim. (228 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1996 Bristol Blenheim. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 91 kg more than 2001 Cadillac XLR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Bristol Blenheim (441 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac XLR. (401 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1996 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac XLR.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Bristol Blenheim 2001 Cadillac XLR
Make Bristol Cadillac
Model Blenheim XLR
Year Released 1996 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5898 cc 4565 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 228 HP 316 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 441 Nm 401 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1745 kg 1654 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2690 mm