1996 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Bristol Blenheim (228 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 558 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Bristol Blenheim (441 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 1996 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 1996 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: