1996 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Bristol Blenheim (228 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 19 kg more than 1996 Bristol Blenheim.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Bristol Blenheim (441 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Bristol Blenheim | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | Blenheim | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |