1996 Buick LeSabre vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird

To start off, 1996 Buick LeSabre is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1996 Buick LeSabre. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 385 kg more than 1996 Buick LeSabre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Buick LeSabre 1962 Ford Thunderbird
Make Buick Ford
Model LeSabre Thunderbird
Year Released 1996 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 6964 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 202 HP 345 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1875 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 5210 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1930 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2820 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 40 L