1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith weights approximately 827 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Because 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith | |
| Make | Buick | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Skylark | Silver Wraith |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 4887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3230 mm |
