1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 872 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Skylark | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |
