1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick Skylark weights approximately 583 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Buick | Renault |
| Model | Skylark | 8 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2280 mm |
