1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick Skylark weights approximately 323 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Skylark (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Buick | Sunbeam |
Model | Skylark | Alpine |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 40 L |