1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham

To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 857 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Buick Skylark 1969 Cadillac Brougham
Make Buick Cadillac
Model Skylark Brougham
Year Released 1996 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3130 cc 7734 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 155 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1323 kg 2180 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5790 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 3390 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 79 L