1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1980 Fiat 128
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1980 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick Skylark weights approximately 448 kg more than 1980 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Buick Skylark has automatic transmission and 1980 Fiat 128 has manual transmission. 1980 Fiat 128 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Buick Skylark will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 1980 Fiat 128 | |
| Make | Buick | Fiat |
| Model | Skylark | 128 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
