1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1986 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Taurus weights approximately 77 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Skylark (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Taurus. (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1996 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 1986 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skylark | Taurus |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |