1996 Buick Skylark vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Buick Skylark is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick Skylark weights approximately 103 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Skylark (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skylark | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |