1996 Buick Skylark vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 267 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Buick Skylark has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Buick Skylark will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | Buick | Daewoo |
Model | Skylark | Arcadia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4960 mm |