1996 Buick Skylark vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Buick | MG |
| Model | Skylark | X20 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
