1996 Buick Skylark vs. 2009 Citroen C4
To start off, 2009 Citroen C4 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C4. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C4 weights approximately 312 kg more than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Skylark (252 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C4. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 2009 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | Skylark | C4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |