1996 Buick Skylark vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Buick Skylark. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Buick Skylark | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skylark | Calais |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |