1996 Buick Skylark vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1996 Buick Skylark. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Buick Skylark. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Buick Skylark. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Buick Skylark | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Buick | Jeep |
| Model | Skylark | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |
