1996 Cadillac Catera vs. 2002 Toyota F-1

To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Cadillac Catera. 1996 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: