1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Caterham 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Simca 5 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Caterham 7 | 1942 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Caterham | Simca |
| Model | 7 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2010 mm |
