1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1964 Lancia Flaminia
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 138 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 827 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Lancia Flaminia (203 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Caterham 7. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Lancia Flaminia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 1964 Lancia Flaminia | |
Make | Caterham | Lancia |
Model | 7 | Flaminia |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 42 L |