1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Caterham 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Renault 4 weights approximately 172 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 1996 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Caterham 7 | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Caterham | Renault |
| Model | 7 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |
