1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Caterham 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Caterham 7 (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Caterham 7 | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Caterham | Triumph |
| Model | 7 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |
