1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Caterham 7 (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 852 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Caterham 7. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Caterham | Daihatsu |
Model | 7 | Taft |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2030 mm |