1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1996 Caterham 7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Sable weights approximately 922 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 1996 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Caterham | Mercury |
Model | 7 | Sable |
Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |