1996 Caterham 7 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 730 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Caterham 7. (156 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 203 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |