1996 Caterham 7 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1312 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3010 mm |