1996 Caterham 7 vs. 2005 Citroen C1
To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Caterham 7 (138 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C1. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C1 weights approximately 402 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 1996 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Caterham 7 (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C1. (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1996 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 2005 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Caterham | Citroen |
Model | 7 | C1 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1470 mm |