1996 Caterham 7 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1996 Caterham 7. (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1996 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1368 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Caterham 7. (156 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Caterham 7 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 7 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 478 kg | 1846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 87 L |