1996 Chevrolet APV vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden Maloo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden Maloo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet APV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chevrolet APV has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chevrolet APV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet APV | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | APV | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
