1996 Chevrolet APV vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet APV. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet APV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet APV weights approximately 805 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet APV. (238 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet APV.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet APV | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | APV | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |