1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 955 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |