1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 735 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford RS 200. (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Blazer | RS 200 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
