1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Honda FCX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Blazer | FCX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 273 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |
