1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 195 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Blazer | Tundra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3270 mm |