1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 570 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Blazer | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
