1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2002 Mazda 323
To start off, 2002 Mazda 323 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 323. (97 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 755 kg more than 2002 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 323. (145 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2002 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | 323 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |