1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 160 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 633 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | 3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 203 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1282 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |