1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 572 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura CSX. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Blazer | CSX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1343 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
