1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 646 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 735 kg more than 2009 Koenigsegg CCX.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 574 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Koenigsegg CCX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Blazer | CCX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 806 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 919 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |
