1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 49 kg more than 2009 Mazda BT-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3010 mm |